To see the situation with my speech, I've created the chart, where you can see the average on each aspect. 1. Organisation 19,5 . This criterion was estimated very high. Most of the topics were presented, when I made corrections to my text, so I could work with attention-getter, linking, the body better. 2. Support 13,25 . The topic was mostly practical, so I presentet tasks and to dilute the descriptions of them, I tried to show them myself. 3. Cohention 9,5 . I tried to summarise everything in the end, but there was a comment, that I'd better say something different as conclusion. 4.Vocal Presentation 19,25 . I'm defenetely glad most people noted I took advantage of all rules I spoke about in my presentation. There was an opinion that my tempo was fast to comprehend the information, though in my opinion I did long enough pauses between the words and ideas. I believe that this happens because of my quite fast tempo of speech in both Russian and English in colloqui...