To see the situation with my speech, I've created the chart, where you can see the average on each aspect.
1. Organisation 19,5. This criterion was estimated very high. Most of the topics were presented, when I made corrections to my text, so I could work with attention-getter, linking, the body better.
2. Support 13,25. The topic was mostly practical, so I presentet tasks and to dilute the descriptions of them, I tried to show them myself.
3. Cohention 9,5. I tried to summarise everything in the end, but there was a comment, that I'd better say something different as conclusion.
4.Vocal Presentation 19,25. I'm defenetely glad most people noted I took advantage of all rules I spoke about in my presentation. There was an opinion that my tempo was fast to comprehend the information, though in my opinion I did long enough pauses between the words and ideas. I believe that this happens because of my quite fast tempo of speech in both Russian and English in colloquial situations, for me it's really hard to slow down, but I need to train it.
5.Physical Presentation 18,5. With the help of comments I've realised how much attention people pay to the picture of speaker. One said it's better to see at least half-body, rather than the head. I thought we are all in the sitting-in-front-of-the-screen situations, but that's important for somebody and I'm to change it next time.
6. Use of time 4,5. (sorry for a mistake in the chart) Everybody said it was wise usage of time. But personally, I think that it wasn't right from my side to say speech takes 12 minutes and end it 4 minutes earlier. Everything should be mapped out precisely.
7. Creativity 8,25. The weakest point of my presentation was visualisation. Unfortunately, it wasn't working right. On the one hand, it was the failure of the computer, Wi-Fi, etc. On the other hand, that was my fault, next time I need to create many ways out(using different browsers, another platforms for demonstration)
The average total point is 92,5 which is high, in general I liked how I presented everything: I added some extra tasks and tips, which are beyond the book; tryed to play with the voice; worked with structure and links between the parts.
1. Organisation 19,5. This criterion was estimated very high. Most of the topics were presented, when I made corrections to my text, so I could work with attention-getter, linking, the body better.
2. Support 13,25. The topic was mostly practical, so I presentet tasks and to dilute the descriptions of them, I tried to show them myself.
3. Cohention 9,5. I tried to summarise everything in the end, but there was a comment, that I'd better say something different as conclusion.
4.Vocal Presentation 19,25. I'm defenetely glad most people noted I took advantage of all rules I spoke about in my presentation. There was an opinion that my tempo was fast to comprehend the information, though in my opinion I did long enough pauses between the words and ideas. I believe that this happens because of my quite fast tempo of speech in both Russian and English in colloquial situations, for me it's really hard to slow down, but I need to train it.
5.Physical Presentation 18,5. With the help of comments I've realised how much attention people pay to the picture of speaker. One said it's better to see at least half-body, rather than the head. I thought we are all in the sitting-in-front-of-the-screen situations, but that's important for somebody and I'm to change it next time.
6. Use of time 4,5. (sorry for a mistake in the chart) Everybody said it was wise usage of time. But personally, I think that it wasn't right from my side to say speech takes 12 minutes and end it 4 minutes earlier. Everything should be mapped out precisely.
7. Creativity 8,25. The weakest point of my presentation was visualisation. Unfortunately, it wasn't working right. On the one hand, it was the failure of the computer, Wi-Fi, etc. On the other hand, that was my fault, next time I need to create many ways out(using different browsers, another platforms for demonstration)
The average total point is 92,5 which is high, in general I liked how I presented everything: I added some extra tasks and tips, which are beyond the book; tryed to play with the voice; worked with structure and links between the parts.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий